Ram Gopal Varma's profileMy BlogPhotosBlogLists Tools Help

Blog


    6/24/2008

    My reactions to reactions

    1. You could have explored the connect between the janata and the Nagres more and shown their compassion for Shankar’s death?
    Ans: If you noticed I have always treated the people who idolize Sarkar very ambiguously.  They are almost ghostly in their demeanour. Case in point is when Sarkar gets arrested in Sarkar-I. Instead of them shouting slogans and abusing the police, there is a strange unnatural deathly stillness about them. I copied this from a scene in “The Final Conflict” the 3rd in the series of “The Omen” where when Damien (the son of Satan) addresses a crowd they have a very similar body language. That’s because one would know what kind of people would worship Satan. Taking a leaf from this I thought given the unusual nature of a leader like Subhash Nagre it’s safer to keep them at a distance and leave it to the imagination of the audience.
     
    2. What was running in your mind while making “Nishabd”
    Ans:  Nishabd.
     
    3. People / media criticize you because of their expectations from you.
    Ans: Any criticism made by anybody is only for the express purpose of entertaining themselves and others.
     
    4. Why did you make “Madhyanam Hatya”? Please don’t say “because I wanted to make it.”
    Ans: Thanks for making me feel predictable. But that’s the only reason and it’s the same reason for all my films. 
     
    5. I have heard lot about the hardships you went through before making your first film.
    Ans: Not true. I always have had a ball in my life ever since I can remember. Difficulties and hardships are a state of mind. If you truly believe and understand that you are nothing, but just one more person among the millions of people out there and also understand that none of them owe you anything, you will come to terms with the fact that you cannot and should not depend on anybody or anything and the onus is on you to make it in life. Let’s say you desire to go from your town to another town and en-route it starts raining. Someone tells you that the road might be flooding ahead. Now you have a choice to turn back or somehow get a ride in a car or continue driving taking the risk of may be getting stuck or even dying as long as your objective is to reach the other town. But one thing you should not do is to blame the rain or get angry with it or pray to it or plead with it. The rain is the difficulties and the town I wanted to reach is making my first film and I enjoyed and got enriched by my journey each and every minute of it.
     
    6. In Shiva, was Chinna hitting the pole shot, thought at scripting stage or did it happen during the shoot?
    Ans: Actually I copied that from a scene in Balu Mahendra’s film “Sadma” (“Moondrum Pirai” in Tamil) starring Kamal Hassan and Sridevi. In the climax Sridevi is in the train which is moving towards us in the right of the frame and Kamal is running in the left of the frame towards us desperate to see Sridevi. So the audience’s eyes are caught in between Kamal and the train just in case Sridevi will come out, so they miss the entry of pole from the left till they see Kamal suddenly hit it. I reversed this in Shiva. I established Chinna being chased by the goons. In that particular shot he is running towards the camera. I deliberately kept space to the left and as Chinna looks back to the left of the frame behind him to see if the goons are following it draws the attention of the audience to the same and they miss the poles entry from the right of the frame till he hits it. Because they are in the emotional state of Chinna the suddenness of it creates an impact as if they themselves have been hit. As per your question whether I thought of it in the script or it happened at the shoot you should address this to Mr. Balu Mahendra. As you know now I copied it from him. Incidentally Sudhakar hitting the rock scene is from Mansoor Khan’s  “Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak” which more or less has the same psychology.
     
    7. I heard you are remaking Aag. Why would you want to remake your own film?
    Ans: Who else would do it? A flop one at that? I am basically like the spider in that Kings story where he learns from it never to give up.
     
    8. Enough of mafia, horror and thrillers! Make some responsible movies that can bring in change in all of us.
    Ans: Ok Sir
     
    9. I did not understand your answer on why you are so fascistic in your decisions. Can you explain it for this KG student of filmmaking?
    Ans: - Wait till you grow up.
     
    10. With every movie you have an incredible story to tell. Just that in a few of them the execution strays.
    Ans: - Well that’s the story of my life. Most of them I would say!
     
    11. How did you have money to produce a big budget movie like Rangeela after your failing in Telugu.
    Ans; - It’s a big misconception people have that to make a film you need money. It is your story idea and your convincing power which will generate money and anything else required. The primary and only concern for stars or investors is about making fame and profit from the people who will come to see it and they make a decision of investing the capital on the strength of your idea and your potential at least by the standards of their vision and everything else will follow. I would like to sum it up as this that nothing is more cheaper in financial terms and more powerful than an idea.
     
    12. Was your first film Shiva inspired from “Arjun”?
    Ans: Yes. It was also taken from Ardh Satya, Kaal Chakra and Mackanna’s Gold. The climax fight on the terrace between Nagarjuna and Shiva was a total rip-off from Mackenna’s Gold cliff fight between Gregory Peck and Omar Shariff.
     
    13. How does the main culprit in Sarkar Raj communicate with the rest of the gang?
    Ans: Ask Sarkar.
     
    14. Why are you answering so rudely?
    Ans: I thought I was being funny.
     
    15. Do you think the interval scene in Sarkar raj would have worked without the “A.C on karo” line?
    Ans: My problem there was I had to give some logic to why the bomb got triggered off when it did. You see the car for a long time in the background and if I didn’t have that line it would have given rise to unnecessary doubts.
     
    16. If one movie after one more fails will you still enjoy support?
    Ans: I think you still have not got the point. You need to understand the word ‘fail’. Without knowing the cost price and sale price you can’t arrive at an understanding of that. Also in case a Director makes films which loose money for all concerned one after the other you still have to take into consideration the aspect that the industry needs at least 120 films per year to cater to the theatres. Considering that no Director can make more than 2 films a year that too a rarity. You still need 60 Directors to do the job. Then it boils down to your list of choices. Try and think of Directors whose films you would like to watch. I doubt you can think of more than 15. Even if you did not like my last 5 films it’s still possible if you come as a Producer that my name might still crop up somewhere in the top 10 to 12 names. So in other words if the industry were to make films only with Directors you like, 80% of theatres will close down.  The bottom line is that there will always be work for a worker.
     
    17. Where do you get inspiration to make comedies like Money and Anaganaga Oka Roju?
    Ans: Life! I believe that life is actually a comedy which pretends to be a tragedy.
     
    18. I would like to see your take on inter-culture romance and marriages.
    Ans: I don’t believe in all 3 whether inter or not.
     
    19. You see the crockery before you buy it and buy it only if you liked it unlike a movie where you have to see it to know if it is good. That’s where reviews and trade analyses matter.
    Ans: It’s a given fact that no two people will have the same sensibilities and tastes and state of minds and intelligence levels which would be the principal parameters which will influence your appreciation of a film. But on the other hand it goes without saying that if you think someone else can judge for you and he will have the same taste and sensibility as you whether that’s your friend or your wife or a critic or your servant, you are welcome to go ahead and make that choice for yourself.
     
    Also like any product like a car or a cell-phone or anything else you see on an Ad or hear about it or you trust the company that manufactured it only when you experience it will you truly know whether you like it or not. So all I am saying is that any creative work can be only an interaction between the individual viewer and the maker.

    Comments (69)

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    Oct. 23
    rammahipalwrote:
    I like your arrogance and attitude, how many times did u feel  you should have been more humble?...by the way it happens to me
    Sept. 14
    Picture of Anonymous
    (no name) wrote:
    I like your arrogance and attitude, how many times did u feel  i should have been more humble?...by the way it happens to me
    Sept. 14
    Picture of Anonymous
    us colleges comparison wrote:
    mba colleges. us colleges. colleges in South-Dakota. colleges in Alabama. Alaska colleges mba colleges. us colleges. colleges in South-Dakota. colleges in Alabama. Oregon college informati college comparison Oregon college informaticompare Maine colleges. american colleges comparison. New-Ham college comparison compare Maine colleges. american colleges comparison. New-Hamcolleges in Delaware. us colleges c colleges in California colleges in Delaware. us colleges cus colleges comparison. us colleges. co college information us colleges comparison. us colleges. co
    Sept. 11
    Picture of Anonymous
    Sam wrote:

     Any plans for Sarkar Rani,  Aishwarya as Lead..... Kudos to RGV's Sequels :-)

    July 25
    July 18
    No namewrote:
    Hi Sir,
     
    I am coming to Mumbai on 21st July. Want to meet u. Could you please tell me how can I reach to u?
    Please help. I am leaving my job and coming all the way to meet u. Working with u has always been my dream. Can u please help me. I have done a diploma course in film making and made 8 shortfilms and also I have acted in some of mine and my collegues' shortfilms. Can u please help me to recruite in the Factory?
     
    Thanks and Regards,
    D. Omkar
    July 11
    srikanthwrote:
    sir ,
    why new faces in Contract.
    We have Manoj Bahpai, Ajay Devgan, Randeep Hooda.
    July 11
    No namewrote:
    Namaskar Ram Gopal Saheb
    Tumchya Sarkha Director kadhi Zhalach nahi Aani Honar Pan nahi !
    Mala Pan Ek Chance Dya Saheb !

    Jay Maharashtra !
    July 11
    No namewrote:
    Hello Ramu garu,
     
    Me ,A  big fan of your Direction and I like Mahesh Babu a lot.  Can we expect a film in your combination !!!
    July 11
    No namewrote:
    Hello Ramu Sir,
     
    Sarkar Raj was a Intellectual treat. Congrats for that. I have a feeling it will be taught in Film Schools as a classic in Screenplay, for its brilliance in unfolding of the Plot, the story telling idea from Cinematographers lens.....every frame of it was well thought and executed.Kudos for that. All masterpieces are received skeptically at first, i know u give a damn to that, thats the best part of you and makes you evolve with every movie or urs. Just like Satya was a roguh work for Company, ironically Satya was a superhit and Company can be termed Classic according to a audinece like me, to talk abt preparation may be it all began with Shiva. And then Ratri was first step towards Bhoot which was a masterpiece well potrayed by Urmila. And then Sarkar Raj happened, while people admired Sarkar and dint welcome the other version with open minds its a Pity. Its a pity if u think abt the crowd. They tasted Satya first, they thought Company was on the lines of it, but its the other way round. Similary they tasted Sarkar and they wanted something in the same lines, they have to get out of the 'rut' and think. All the Camera angles in Sarkar were nothing new, we tasted them in Nishabd and all of ur other movies, some of it atleast. But in Sarkar Raj it was so Evolved, its as if u were speaking from the camera lens, before u spoke thru ur charachters, the scenes where, she is frying in the kitchen it gives the feeling of the moment, the tension they are going thru, the angle from inside the Handle, it gives the Point of view that things are being watched from such a small angle, things like it, Like the Scenes from the terrace while Shankar comes, the tension in the crowd, when shakar and Amitabh were speaking the tension the tension that was there between them was so well shown with the distortion and hazyness in the Camera, we can actually feel the uneassiness, it was simply superb. and the Scene where Amitabh talks to his sons Frame, the way u brilliantly picuturized it revelaing only what parts of the face were required and with the right amnt of expression was a masterpiece, again the lens speaks. the similar scene was there in Mohabattein again done by Amitabh and sharuk, but there is Zameen Asmaan difference here. Here the hearts churns and melts which leaves a lasting impression on the mind, wehreas the other the heart just cries for the dialogues renederd, there leaves the creative genious , no offence meant to anyone though. i am bad at diplomacy and all. But theres more to ur evolvement in Sarkar Raj i felt, though its not seen of u till now, like in u brought up the Topic of Vishnu and made Shankar tell his father to try to learn to forget him, ok till then its typical u, bt later on u kill his own son which was to be born and u beautifully insert the part of naming him 'Vishnu' which is not like u at all then u kill him, sutly stating the Karmic Circle of Life, WOW which is a new angle of you!!! It shows ur Evolvement and all that. I know u dont like all this kinda observation bt i cudnt help bt notice as ur follower being an eccentric myself. I was quite upset when u said Abhishek is a better actor than Amitabh bt the way u treated Amitabh's charecter and brought him back to power in Sarkar Raj it felt justified.
    July 10
    sarithawrote:
    Ram gopal varma garu
     
    Sarkar raj chusanu. superb movie. terrific script. I was so eager to see sarkar raj and to know that its a big hit. I hate when few people from bollywood comment on you terribly. someone like karan johar or sharukh khan or whomso ever, mana telugu guy ni takkuva chestara ani naku kopam vastundhi. you proved your talent again. thank you.
    July 10
    pavanwrote:
    sir i want to meet you & work with the factory please tell me how
    July 10
    No namewrote:
    I thought that , you would be one of the most busiest person in bombay...but looks like you have been spending a lot of time reacting to reactions...
    July 10
    sudhirwrote:
    hello ramu sir,
    i m big fan of u r movies.bcoz. i like the background music and camera work in u r films.
    SHIVA a trend setter movie at that time and gives lifes to u and nag in film indutry.
    before shiva no one no you.how u got chance to make shiva?how u approached nag?
    i listernd u done as asst. at b.gopal is it true?
    plz..exaplain it...for me sir.
     
    July 4
    Picture of Anonymous
    Ajay Govind / Gopal Nagr wrote:
    Until I make an entry into the factory, and have a face to face conversation to you and we sit together discuss shot taking and shot breakdowns of my film 'the adulterous woman' I resort to this one blog/comment piece. In my every film--short long fiction non-fic--I have sought inspiration from the way your films said to me as an audience ... "explore possiblities".

    And then when I made films--first for myself and then for an 'audience'--I caught on to you saying I don't need 100s of people watching my film. Even if just 5 people who are really interested watch it, my job is done.  I think that was Naach. More than 5 people watch it. I took 4 different people for it 4 different times. The shot of Reva's feet on the rock when they are conversing. Abhishek's close-up. The shot in the car. The intensity. Incomparable.

    And now Sarkar Raj. Brilliant. And I-like many of your avid fans are looking forward to the sequel. And to Contract and Phoonk and anything and everything you set your hands on.

    I sincerely felt that while you may have felt you needed to apologize for Aag (I don't think you needed to) you certainly didn't need to apologize for Nishabd which was in the true sense India's answer to the Hollywood genre of the 'melodrama'.

    Amit Roy's camera captures your vision in the most bewildering almost intoxicating way.

    A case in point being--my favorite scene in Sarkar Raj the one shot from under the table. As audiences you let us --secretly--listen to characters; to their hearts and their minds. Spectacular stuff.

    Incredible close-ups. And rivetting camera movements.

    What I like is the amount of thought time energy and indeed money to put in to get the treatment right. Different.

    When Samuel Beckett was asked how he wrote his masterpiece "Waiting for Godot" he answered "Fast. Never faster." What mattered was not what he said or what he tried to mean; but how he said it. Style.

    And in your films style and substance come together finely balanced. Naach, Company (being a malayalee it was a treat to watch Mohanlal in that role--a perfect casting decision!), Satya, Kaun, Daud, Sarkar, Sarkar Raj

    I was disappointed in my dad when he tried to compare Sarkar Raj with its first part. Two different films. One so firmly placed in grey areas. In the jail Sarkar is shot at in the way MKG was shot at in Hey Ram. And there's his glasses, and the background music somewhere a hint of vaishnava janato.... But you can't completely say he is white, and he himself doesn't say that.

    And this one so clearly tending towards white. Development. Calling themselves 'neta' - chosen leaders of course, not forced. Working for the people; with the people. Needing and getting their support at every stage. Doubts being raised on their intentions --as with politicians. Could we ever have imagined Sarkar of the first part being vulnerable? Never. In his own fortress his daughter-in-law would be killed and he would not be able to save her?

    Anyway, I could literally go on and on endlessly. Let me end with a question. As one of the three producers of Dil Se... one of my all-time favorite movies... what role did you play? Just finances?

    PS: Chicku ... am assuming is going to make his appearance in the next film as a 24-26 year old guy. I am preparing for that role. ;) (Umeed pe duniya jeeti hain....) I hope you are thinking of new faces of Ritesh Deshmukh. Frail, wearing white with a kada on his hand. Fashioned after his dad. After much contemplation and tossing many names... Gopal Nagre sounded very good. Maybe as a tribute to a fan, follower (future?) of yours you can select that one..? The humble request of a seemingly immodest filmmaker. :)

    thanks for making movies. will try and keep in touch. next stage; beyond blogs.
    July 1
    spartanwrote:
    plz make a film like pokiri , iwant to see u how u would make film with that character.
    u can make wonders with that character.
    June 28
    Naveen Raowrote:
    hi ram, i just got to know that sudeep is the main actor in phoonk....just can't wait to see the movie.....also read that he is doing another movie with you after phoonk...true?
    June 28
    Picture of Anonymous
    Vito Corleone wrote:
    Hi Ramu,
     
    Thanx for giving me detailed answers. Feeling elated! And I also appreciate your frankness and confession! I doubt how many, in this hypocritical world can accept the truth like you do! Though I watched 'Vasantha Kokila', never felt so...probably, I was too young when I'd watched it. Btw, I felt that you lifted scenes like Nag & Amala rotating the glass of water, Nirmalamma slapping Sai Chand...from Jaws. But what ever, it is...we should appreciate your talent of adaptation. I strongly feel there is nothing wrong with inspiration/adaptation as long as it gels well with the content.
     
    Did anybody ever make you an offer (professionally) that you couldn't refuse ? Better mention atleast one...if you don't want one here :-)
     
    Vito
    June 28
    Fountain Head worked out - Here is how it can be adapted to contemporary times. Instead of architecture, Politics in India can be epicenter. Architecture in the book was portrayed as an art that ceased to be an art and lacked purpose beyond external appeal. Today in India social service which is the underlying cause for politics no longer exists as a purpose. Like how in the book a few people behaved as if architecture was a property that belongs to them, parties in India behave like politics is their property. In both cases the industry is open for a thinker who can stand out with his knowledge, application and personality.
    Toohey can be a political analyst who takes the side of the left parties and eventually ends up on a news paper owned by 'Times of India'. Gail will be running that newspaper.
    Roark will try work for one of the political parties that has been battered by the system but has a lot of ideals. Then everything else as the story progresses.
    Guy francon will be running one of the parties. Keating will shine through that party and eventually the party collapses.
    Dominique has to be a movie star. Otherwise people will not accept her getting married so many times.
    Drawings of architecture can be replaced with social service acts. Keating would keep asking Roark on various methods of social service and after Roark gives him a plan, Keating would add a flavor to it - and that flavour would be how will the party financially benefit from it.
    Huge construction in the end can be compared to something like - providing free food to all 'below poverty line' people in a sustainable method. While Keating would tweak the plan to say how the party could profit from it. For this purpose they could be building a huge granary which roark will bomb....
     
    only piece missing is what is it that Gail would want from Roark??? think and let me know
    June 27

    Trackbacks

    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None